I haven’t seen MSpec but I’ve heard good things about it. I’m not doing development in .Net at the moment so I haven’t had a chance to use any of the .Net BDD frameworks in anger.

I would suggest to try several of them and see which one(s) allow you to express your intent most obviously. It’s a subjective thing so be prepared to kiss a couple of frogs!

You should also check out NBehave, which has a nice plain text scenario runner as well as a clean DSL-ish interface. At the end of the day it’s about what works for you – lots of .Net BDD people get by with just plain old NUnit and their favourite mocking framework.

I wonder if you’ve seen Machine.Specifications (MSpec), Ron Conery’s BDD framework for .NET?

I guess you did, but just in case here’s a very good introduction to it: http://blog.wekeroad.com/mvc-storefront/kona-3/
and the (great) screencast:

http://silverlight.services.live.com/58326/Kona%203%20Learning%20BDD/video.wmv

I liked the syntactic sugar a lot and how it generates the output and report in very readable text.

What do you think about it? Is it the correct way to BDD?

I’m thinking of implementing BDD and would like to have your opinion.
Thanks,

Kevin

I am very excited about a new
design and testing methodology called BDD that I have……

Just for curiosity, you wrote “It’s also surprisingly satisfying to be writing in vim rather than Microsoft Word!”
Which publishing system do they use? Latex, docbook or whatelse?

Sorry for my ugly english.